Guía docente de Investigación Feminista: Casos de Estudio (Ii) (M15/56/4/23)
Máster
Módulo
Rama
Centro Responsable del título
Semestre
Créditos
Tipo
Tipo de enseñanza
Profesorado
- Gerardo Rodríguez Salas
- María Adelina Sánchez Espinosa
Tutorías
Gerardo Rodríguez Salas
Email- Tutorías 1º semestre
- Martes 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Martes 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Tutorías 2º semestre
- Martes 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Martes 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
María Adelina Sánchez Espinosa
Email- Tutorías 1º semestre
- Miercoles 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Miercoles 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Miércoles 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Miércoles 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 9:30 a 12:30 (Despacho)
- Tutorías 2º semestre
- Miércoles 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Miercoles 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Miércoles 9:30 a 10:30 (Despacho)
- Miercoles 12:30 a 14:30 (Despacho)
- Viernes 9:30 a 12:30 (Despacho)
Breve descripción de contenidos (Según memoria de verificación del Máster)
This course is taught in English. Following the advice of the consortium board, it includes “GEMMA voices”: sessions conducted by GEMMA alumni who are now doctoral or postdoctoral researchers and/or professors. This is based on the exchange of research experiences between more senior invited scholars, GEMMA pre and postdoc alumni and GEMMA early-stage researchers preparing their master theses
Prerrequisitos y/o Recomendaciones
Competencias
Competencias Básicas
- CB6. Poseer y comprender conocimientos que aporten una base u oportunidad de ser originales en desarrollo y/o aplicación de ideas, a menudo en un contexto de investigación.
- CB7. Que los estudiantes sepan aplicar los conocimientos adquiridos y su capacidad de resolución de problemas en entornos nuevos o poco conocidos dentro de contextos más amplios (o multidisciplinares) relacionados con su área de estudio.
- CB8. Que los estudiantes sean capaces de integrar conocimientos y enfrentarse a la complejidad de formular juicios a partir de una información que, siendo incompleta o limitada, incluya reflexiones sobre las responsabilidades sociales y éticas vinculadas a la aplicación de sus conocimientos y juicios.
- CB9. Que los estudiantes sepan comunicar sus conclusiones y los conocimientos y razones últimas que las sustentan a públicos especializados y no especializados de un modo claro y sin ambigüedades.
- CB10. Que los estudiantes posean las habilidades de aprendizaje que les permitan continuar estudiando de un modo que habrá de ser en gran medida autodirigido o autónomo.
Resultados de aprendizaje (Objetivos)
- To make students familiar with the research done by academics and other professionals in the fields of Women’s Studies and Gender.
- To illustrate research experiences and methodologies so that students can see other researchers in action, share their experiences and contextualise their own research.
- To run a workshop where students themselves talk about their own research experiences at a time when master theses must seriously be thought of just before starting the final GEMMA term.
Programa de contenidos Teóricos y Prácticos
Teórico
1. Workshops led by visiting scholars and GEMMA UGR teachers.
2. Workshops led by GEMMA alumni: "GEMMA Voices"
2. Workshop on students’ own research.
Bibliografía
Bibliografía fundamental
Given the nature of the course, specific readings for every session will be communicated in due time. They will be made accessible via dropbox
Enlaces recomendados
Metodología docente
Evaluación (instrumentos de evaluación, criterios de evaluación y porcentaje sobre la calificación final.)
Evaluación Ordinaria
Continuous assessment throughout the duration of the course and three assessment methods:
Assessment method 1: Attendance and active class participation
Description: attendance will be registered for every session. Participant teachers will evaluate the student's participation and report to the course coordinator.
Percentage over final grade: 20%
Assessment method 2: Critical Dossier on the workshops and research presentations
Description: Preparation of a critical review on five of the sessions with special emphasis on how they dialogue with the student's research.
Evaluation criteria: Innovation, creativity, critical ability and agile use of pertinent bibliography.
Deadline for the submission of the critical dossier: March 15, 2025.
Percentage over final grade: 30%
Assessment method 3: Individual Master Thesis Project public presentation
Description: Presentation of the master thesis project in dialogue with the class participants and other public, followed by Q&A.
Evaluation criteria: Innovation, creativity, critical ability, agile use of pertinent bibliography, ability to summarise main research questions, ability to communicate ideas, ability to find relevant examples, ability to respond to the questions from the participants in the session.
Percentage over final grade: 30%
Assessment method 4: Post-presentation written reflection. Description: Written reflection on the presentation session and on the added value of the feedback coming from class participants.
Evaluation criteria: Innovation, creativity, critical ability, reflection ability, self-critical ability.
Percentage over final grade: 20%
ANY FORM OF PLAGIARISM IN ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OR ASSIGNMENTS (INCLUDING UNAUTHORISED USE OF AI) WILL LEAD TO THE FINAL GRADE 0% AND TO WHATEVER LEGAL MEASURES THE UGR OR/AND THE GEMMA CONSORTIUM MAY DECIDE TO IMPOSE.
Evaluación Extraordinaria
Students who have not been evaluated through continuous assessment or who have failed in the first call will be asked to produce:
Assessment method 1: An oral presentation of their master thesis project (Percentage over final grade: 70%) with the teachers involved.
Assessment method 2: A written report on the master thesis project, including the lessons learnt after the oral presentation debate (Percentage over final grade: 30%)
Evaluation criteria: Innovation, creativity, critical ability, agile use of pertinent bibliography, ability to summarise main research questions, ability to communicate ideas, ability to find relevant examples, ability to respond to the questions from the participants in the session.
ANY FORM OF PLAGIARISM IN ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OR ASSIGNMENTS (INCLUDING UNAUTHORISED USE OF AI) WILL LEAD TO THE FINAL GRADE 0% AND TO WHATEVER LEGAL MEASURES THE UGR OR/AND THE GEMMA CONSORTIUM MAY DECIDE TO IMPOSE.
Evaluación única final
Article 8 of the "Normativa de Evaluación y Calificación de los Estudiantes de la Universidad de Granada" allows students who cannot fullfil the requirements for continuous assessment because of duely justified reasons to be evaluated at the end of the academic year. Students needing this form of evaluation should apply within the first two weeks of the academic year following the procedure specified by this UGR regulation. Evaluación Única Final" will consist of: Assessment method 1: An oral presentation of their master thesis project (Percentage over final grade: 70%) Assessment method 2: A written report on the master thesis project, including the lessons learnt after the oral presentation debate (Percentage over final grade: 30%) Evaluation criteria: Innovation, creativity, critical ability, agile use of pertinent bibliography, ability to summarise main research questions, ability to communicate ideas, ability to find relevant examples, ability to respond to the questions from the participants in the session. ANY FORM OF PLAGIARISM IN ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OR ASSIGNMENTS (INCLUDING UNAUTHORISED USE OF AI) WILL LEAD TO THE FINAL GRADE 0% AND TO WHATEVER LEGAL MEASURES THE UGR OR/AND THE GEMMA CONSORTIUM MAY DECIDE TO IMPOSE.
|
Información adicional
Información de interés para estudiantado con discapacidad y/o Necesidades Específicas de Apoyo Educativo (NEAE): Gestión de servicios y apoyos (https://ve.ugr.es/servicios/atencionsocial/ estudiantes-con-discapacidad).